Archive for daytrading

Google
 

Halloween’s Fed Fade Trade Deconstructed

Today, the reaction to the Fed announcement was classic… textbook, even. It’s the spike/ reversal scenario I’ve observed (and occasionally traded) for years, and documented step- by- step in September as referenced in the pre-announcement post earlier today (see “related link” below).

As I said, the reaction isn’t always so perfect. But when it is, it’s simply beautiful.

Here’s the hand-drawn scribble I used last month to explain the trade:

Trading the FOMC Announcement

And now here’s a 3-minute chart of today’s action and The Trade:

10/31/07 Fed Fade Trade on QQQQ

The Big Dummy is onto something, n’est ce pas?

Today, the FFT gave an entry at 54.20 on the Qs, with an initial stop at the bottom of the spike-noodle (that’s my scientific term for it), or 54.04. That’s a total initial risk, or “R” of 16 cents.

Using a simple 2-bar trailing stop, the trade was exited at 54.88, for a gain of 68 cents, or 4.25R in only 36 minutes.

For you home gamers, that means risking $320 on the Qs would have returned $1360 in the same 36 minutes.

As I’ve also said before, this trade works maybe 60 percent of the time. Perhaps 5 or 6 “Fed days” each year. But when it does (like today, and big-time in June), it’s possible to make a serious gain in only a few minutes if traded correctly.

Related link: Profiting from the Fed Announcement: The Fed Fade Trade (15 Sep 07)

As always, cheers and best of luck.


It’s That Time Again!

We’ve got about 25 minutes now…. ready for a potential Fed Fade Trade?


Vote For Your Favorite Daytrade Scanning Components

Click on the arrows below to vote for which factors you consider to be important when scanning for daytrade candidates. You can vote “up” or “down” on any/all items. Please feel free to add items of your own!


Profiting from the Fed Announcement: The Fed Fade Trade

With experience, skill and a bit of luck, it’s often possible to make a quick, profitable trade in the minutes after an FOMC announcement by “fading” the first reaction spike.

The Fed announces its Target Funds Rate decision at 2:15 EST on the last day of the meeting, normally a Tuesday for one-day meetings and Wednesday for two-day meetings. Immediately after the announcement, the market typically goes into wild oscillations, the amplitude of which depends on recent volatility, whether the announcement is a “surprise” compared to expectations, and most of all, how many people are watching and waiting to jump in.

Caution #1: This trade is not for the inexperienced, the undisciplined or the faint of heart. I’d only recommend it to experienced traders who have the self-control to take a small loss instantly, not giving in to “hope” for even 5 seconds if the trade goes against you, because if this trade goes against you, you may be on the wrong side of the Big Swing, and holding on can do massive damage in a matter of minutes. It’s best to watch a few Fed announcement days and paper-trade for practice first, noting the (many) ways in which you can get caught pointing in the wrong direction.

Caution #2: This pattern works out about 60+% of the time, in my experience. I consider those great odds since the anticipated gain is multiples of the maximum loss (initial stop!). However, the times it doesn’t work, if you drop your plan and start trying to “second-guess” entry points, you’re just trading on emotion, and you WILL lose money. If the trade sets up, I take it. Otherwise, I do not trade Fed days except occasionally right at the close.

The Setup: Wait for the First Swing to Falter

(Note- there’s an example chart at the bottom of this post)

The “fade trade” takes advantage of the fact that individuals often react to the first movement after the news, afraid of being left out of a big run. The “smart” money usually lets this swing go for a few minutes (typically until about 2:20 or 2:25), then takes it violently in the other direction, often doubling or tripling the range of the first swing.

The Trade: Spike, Doodle, Reverse!

Here’s how I enter the Fed Fade Trade:

  • I ignore the market altogether until at least 2:10 EST. Sometimes I don’t even look until around 2:19 to 2:20, so that I don’t get caught up in the excitement when the announcement hits.

  • A short time-frame chart is required to see the swings clearly. My personal preference is 3-minute bars. 5-minute bars work pretty well, too. 1-minute bars usually cause me to enter or exit too soon.

  • Important! I let the post-2:15 swing go whichever direction it likes, however far it likes. It may spike up on “bad” news or down on “good” news. I do not try to predict the direction by the news.

  • At about 2:20, I start watching for one or two narrow-range sideways bars near the extreme of the spike. These bars often appear between 2:19 and 2:29.

  • Once a narrow bar has formed, I take the break of its range in the opposite direction of the spike as an entry signal, with the extreme of the spike as a hard stop. No exceptions, no wait- and- see, no hoping.

    For example, if we get a downward spike from 2:15 to 2:20, then a sideways “noodle,” I’ll get long (opposite the spike) on the break of the “noodle” bar’s top, with a stop at the spike’s low.

  • At this point, if the price reverses back through the extreme of the spike and hits the initial stop (and this can be 10 seconds after the trade is placed), the trade is exited, no ifs, ands or buts.

The Exit

Ok, so what if I catch the falling knife and find myself up “6R” in 14 minutes? This is where stop-management strategies come in, and I’d recommend a very aggressive trailing stop. This is a quick trade, the trend is NOT your friend; spank it and get out.

I watch for reversals particularly at 1) the level where the first spike started at 2:15 EST and 2) when the current thrust has reached 2x the range of the first spike. If we make it through those, I’ll trail the stop up using Fibonacci levels or my variation on the PSAR. If the spike I’m riding is simply HUGE and I’m up “8-10R” or more (happens only once every few years), I’ll jump out at the first sign of any reversal, whether I’ve caught the extreme or not.

What It Looks Like: A Long FFT Off A 2:15 Down Spike

I’ve watched this phenomenon for many years, and traded it quite a few times. I have not captured intraday charts on Fed days, however, so here is a hand-drawn example for your viewing pleasure:

Trading the FOMC Announcement

The Fed meeting coming up this Tuesday should be a doosey. We may see some extreme post-announcement action. Should be fun.

Let me know what you think- comments always welcomed.


TDAmeritrade StrategyDesk Formula To Exclude First 10 Minutes

I got a great question via email the other day, thought I’d share the topic. It’s been quite a while since I’ve written about (or used) TDAmeritrade StrategyDesk, and it’s now up to v1.3.

When I use StrategyDesk anymore, it’s solely for backtesting. Back in the Spring it was too slow (the updates were sometimes minutes late) to use for hair-trigger daytrading.

This question was specifically for a formula related to daytrading, however. The reader wanted a formula which would show all stocks which are up more than 3%, but only after 9:40 EST, the reasoning being that it would give the market time to “settle out” a bit and not trigger any bad trades during that wild first few minutes.

The following should eliminate all results for the 09:30-09:39:59 period:

((Bar[Hour,10] = 9) * (Bar[Minute,10] = 30) = 0)

The 3% part just goes like this: (Last > (Bar[Close,D,1]*1.03))

So all we do is connect them with an “AND” to get the final version for our screener:

(Last > (Bar[Close,D,1]*1.03)) AND ((Bar[Hour,10] = 9) * (Bar[Minute,10] = 30) = 0)


P.S.For any new visitors looking for more formulas, there’s also the StrategyDesk Formula Reference I wrote months back, before Ameritrade came out with decent user documentation. Enjoy.


Three Little Indians and a Wolfe

[Please note this post is from 5/30/07; work and life intervened, and I’m publishing it a day late– ed.]

Today I noticed a pattern forming on the Qs, started drawing lines here and there, and lo and behold, a beautiful example emerged.

I’m talking about the Three Little Indians setup popularized by Linda Bradford Raschke (also known as Three Pushes to a Top, Three Drives, Three Waves to a Peak, Three Monkeys on a Branch, etc), and also the concept of the Wolfe Wave, a subset of Three Little Indians which has more particular rules, but which in return provides clear entry and exit targets.

Three Little Indians

Around midday, I was looking at the smooth swings the chart of the Qs was making as price methodically plodded higher. It’s gotta run out of steam at some point, I was thinking. Suddenly it occurred to me that I was looking at Three Little Indians:

QQQQc

Three higher highs, three higher lows. Time to watch for a double-top and failure.

Then I got to looking closer, saw that the second higher low was below the first peak at “1“, and realized I was looking at the elusive Wolfe Wave.

Wolfe Waves

In Wolfe Waves, the three highs are numbered according to the thrust, or “wave”:

QQQQe

Wolfe Waves have more stringent requirements than Three Little Indians. I’m no expert on them, so do your own homework, but on the chart above the following would be necessary:

  • The thrusts must be evenly spaced, time-wise

  • High “3” must be higher than high “1

  • Low “4” must retrace to below High “1” but not beyond Low “2

  • And so on… (to quote Vonnegut)

So, realizing we have a Wolfe Wave, we draw lines through 1-3 and 2-4. These lines should form a rising wedge in an uptrend and a falling wedge in a downtrend. We see on this chart they do:

QQQQd

Now the Wolfe Wave strategy says that point “5” typically is an exhaustion spike which exceeds the 1-3 trendline. A short could be entered on the failure back below that line. We see on the above chart that the price went ahead and walked up to the point of the wedge, still a good place to short.

What are we shooting (shorting) for? Wolfe gives us a target: The extension of a line between High “1” and Low “4“:

QQQQf

Enough already. What happened?

QQQQg

At this point one could theoretically flip and go back long (the primary direction of the day, after all), with an appropriate stop loss, of course. That would have worked to perfection today:

QQQQi

Again, I’m not an expert here. Caviar Emperor, as the Romans say.


Let’s Take A Quick Walk Around This Thing

As planned, the previous trade got stopped at 46.60 this morning. A surge down to 45.20 would have been so nice, but, c’est trading. Instead I’ve got either a quick, acceptable swing trade or a very nice extended daytrade behind me, depending on who I’m telling the story to.

Where are we now?

QQQQ 5/29/07

We’re in the middle of some significant sideways action. Remember, in the book of Dummy, volume at price equals support and resistance. The direction we break out of this range is very important.

After that heavy “down” volume a couple of days back, I’m leaning towards shorting (I always seem to be), but I need the math to back me up before I do. And, despite all appearances to the contrary, I’d be content to go long as well, given an appropriate setup.

I used to enter a swing trade based on the high or low of the previous day. My current method looks for significant movement in the direction of the entry, which may or may not coincide with that previous bar’s extreme.

The numbers I’m coming up with tonight show me I likely won’t be taking a trade tomorrow. I need about 46.10 to get short on the Qs. About 151 on the Ps, 480 or so below the shooting star on GOOGle oogle oogle, and about 112 on my old friend AAPL. What, you thought I forgot Apple?

Long? I really need a break and pullback on any of ‘em.

‘ats it for now.


Caught Short Here, Boss (on QQQQ, that is)

(That’s a little Cool Hand Luke humor for you gen X’ers).

I am presently short the Qs. There’s a bigger story to do with the overall market, economy and geopolitical issues, but this note is just about what happened today:

QQQQ 5/23/07

The Qs opened with a slight gap up, then backed down a bit on diminishing volume, then ran up above yesterday’s high of 47.28. So much for the 2b on the shorter chart. Anyway, after the break to the new high, we got some noodling and retracing, until right at noon when we got a hammer right at yesterday’s high (support). If there was significant buying waiting to come in, this was its chance. We should have seen a hard thrust up to a new high.

Instead, we got - nuthin’. A little climb away from the hammer, then dribbling back down towards 47.25 again. With multiple time frames showing overbought, and then this hesitation, that was all the excuse I needed. I got short in the high 47.20s with a stop above the day’s high.

Then I had to go to work. I didn’t get the chance to close the position by 4pm EST, so I’m riding a short into tomorrow. Not sure I would have closed it anyway.

Now let’s see if there’s some follow-through.


« Previous entries