Archive for blogging

Google
 

Tagged

Some weeks ago I was tagged by Craig at the Taz Trader Blog. Just saw it. Sorry, man, I’m truly that far behind. I have sleep scheduled for some time in July.

Here are my responses to the tag:

My Five Obsessions:

  • Trying to find the balance between overly permissive and hypervigilant on the constant highwire that is parenting (and no turning back or redos!).

  • Trading. Duh.

  • Hot Coffee.

  • Cold Beer.

  • Motorcycling.

  • Bonus #6: Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, more money (that’s an old Tom T. Hall song for you young people).

Five Reasons Why I Blog:

  • Handy way to keep from having repeat my rants. I just give out the url.

  • Somehow, getting stuff out of the attic (points to head) and onto paper, er, pixels helps to sort it out. Keeping it all in makes me insane.

  • I learn. It seems like I share an ounce of my questionable experience with others and get a pound of clear thought and good wishes in return.

  • It’s cathartic. Hard to explain, but somehow it really is. I’m sure others will agree.

  • Chicks dig it. Yeah, the other guy may eat caviar and have a Learjet and a Ferrari, but I’ve got a bucket of chicken, a six-pack of beer, and DummySpots!
    [note- editor is well aware that Trader-X has a blog AND a Learjet and Ferrari, darn him to heck]

***

That’s all I got. It’s probably too late for me to tag anyone who hasn’t been already, so please consider this an open tag to YOU!


The Late Great Kurt Vonnegut- Advice for Bloggers?

1. Find a subject you care about.
2. Do not ramble, though.
3. Keep it simple.
4. Have the guts to cut.
5. Sound like yourself.
6. Say what you mean to say.
7. Pity the readers.

* quoted in Science Fictionisms (1995), compiled by William Rotsler

Combating Comment Spam with the Dynamic Duo

Comment spam is like the mosquitos down here in Louisiana- even a few are a major PITA, but once they locate you (your blog has been around a while and/or gets some traffic), you can get swarmed to the point where you have to go inside and shut the door (i.e. disable comments) in order to keep from being eaten alive.

For bloggers wanting to allow legitimate commenters unfettered access, the Dynamic Duo of Akismet and Comment Timeout have proven to be the “mosquito net and Deep Woods OFF” combination we’ve needed.

I’ve used Akismet for about 6 or 8 months now, and it’s truly a lifesaver, as it can separate “real” comments from spam with amazing accuracy, allowing real people to post on your site, and segregating the trash to be reviewed/deleted by you behind the scenes at your convenience.

However, during some of those periods where the comment spams “swarm” (hit your site by the hundreds or thousands), it becomes very difficult to review them all, and we bloggers usually end up clicking “Delete All” to be done with it. Many of us would prefer to review the spam queue, just in case a legitimate comment got tagged (very rare, but it happens).

Adding Comment Timeout reduces the overall number of trash comments by about 90%, and since I added it (so far at least), I have only a few spam comments a day to review and delete- takes all of 5 seconds or so.

The next step would be to add a verification word/number for commenters. I’ve not seen that as much of an inconvenience when commenting on others’ sites, and I wouldn’t hesitate to add it if necessary to preserve my readers’ ability to comment on mine.

But at this point, Akismet and Comment Timeout are doing the job nicely.


To Bloggers: Be Humble

Unless you’re one of the rare “cult personalities” on the internet, people aren’t reading your blog because of you… they’re reading it because of what it can do for them. An All About Me blog is fine, but not if you want more readers. What we do and think isn’t nearly as interesting to potential readers as it is to us.

The above quote is from Be Humble, the second of the Seven Blogging Virtues published by the excellent Creating Passionate Users site.

(Of course, when I read that first line about “cult personalities,” I couldn’t help but think of TraderMike and Maoxian!).


Sitemaps - Be Sure You Have One!

If you have your own domain, you should have a current XML Sitemap in your home directory. Now that virtually all the major search engines have adopted Google’s sitemap standards, having one should be considered mandatory. It maximizes the opportunity for search engines to thoroughly index your entire site. The discussion about whether to do it is pretty much settled. It’s like (some philosopher, I can’t remember who) said about his belief in God: “If I do, and I don’t need to, no harm done… but if I don’t, and it turns out I should have… whoa, baby!” (that, of course, is a paraphrase).

What is a sitemap? They more accurately should be called a site index, which is self-explanatory, but the term sitemap has hogged all the attention, and so that’s what they’re still called. A sitemap is simply a properly-formed XML page referencing the URL of every page on your site so that search crawlers have an easier time… crawling.

Now sitemaps technically aren’t necessary for the accurate crawling of your site, but you might be surprised at how some of your pages’ ranks change when the spiders have had a look at your pretty little sitemap for a few weeks. Your pages are easier to find, they rank better, they get more hits and links, so they rank better, so they’re easier to find… kind of an inverted death spiral. A life spiral.

The thing that held me off from uploading a sitemap was, basically, that I’m too dumb to make one. Google gives these instructions in their Webmaster Tools (you do use Google’s Webmaster Tools, don’t you?). See if they make sense to you. People with Computer Science degrees are excused. I’d read a bit, then say “forget it!”.

Then last summer I happened across one of the best little tools I’ve happened to happen across. It’s called the XML-Sitemaps.com Free Online Sitemap Generator, and it’s exactly what the title says. Go there, enter your base URL, have a cup of coffee while it churns away… then voila! download your ready- to- use sitemap! Be sure that the uncompressed sitemap.xml file finds its way to your home directory; you can read the uses for the other files at the site (some folks used to keep html sitemaps in their home directory for other people to look at… that’s purely optional, as after the first few hundred pages, they look like crap.. here’s mine, for instance).

Now just go to Google Webmaster Tools and submit your new sitemap!

It’s just that easy, and I know for me it made a very noticeable difference in my traffic and my rankings. That may have something to do with the quirky way I code lots of my stuff (if you use your turn-key blog software right out of the box, it may not make as big a difference), but even if the crawlers already have an easy time with your site, this will only make it that much easier.

And finally, remember that Google (wink) can’t promise (wink) that having a sitemap (wink) will improve your rankings (wink, wink), but they do “strongly encourage” the practice.

Best of luck. (wink)


QQQQ Swing Short Triggered; StockTickr Interview

I want to talk about today’s trade based on the setup I posted last night, but first I’ve gotta get something off my chest:

YES!

The most textbook failure into a textbook swing short setup that I’ve ever caught:

QQQQ

A gap-down opening, a weak retrace to near the previous close, then a failure of the retrace, then a failure of the opening range and the previous day’s low (which were within pennies of each other). Finally, the BIG failure of the 11/22 Hanging Man I wrote about last night, a 10-minute retrace back up to the failure point of 44.26, then it’s OFF TO THE RACES! Here’s the chart for the entire day:

QQQQ

Now I’ve just gotta find Michelle B. and bum a few Red Apples off of her. [It’s a little celebration joke about “I don’t smoke, but if I did…” — ed.]

 

In Other News…

Dave at StockTickr.com has been kind enough to post an interview with me on his site. I’ve followed his interviews with other traders, and to be included in the same series as that group is very flattering. Thanks Dave![Insert Wayne and Garth here chanting “He’s not worthy! He’s not worthy!”]

Be sure to check out Dave’s entire site while you’re there. You can scroll thru various folks’ StockTickr portfolios and see how they’re doing. Here’s the one for the stocks profiled on WallStrip, for example. Also, there’s the Pro service (I haven’t tried it yet) which has a built-in trading journal and even automatically generates charts for all your trades. Sounds interesting.

 

WordPress Print Styling

Spent some time this evening working on a print stylesheet for the site. The sheet itself isn’t hard at all, just tedious.

A print stylesheet is to a printout of your site what your “normal” stylesheet (”style.css” for most) is to the “screen” (monitor display) version: it defines what the output looks like when anyone hits print or print preview while reading your site.

Most sites, and certainly most WordPress sites, have no defined print style, and so what you see on the screen is far from what you get on your printer. What you’ll get is the content of the site with no CSS styling or formatting at all. Ugly, and hard read. Just click “File / Print Preview” on a few sites and you’ll see what I mean. [As of this writing, I don’t have the print stylesheet finished for my “index” page, so you can hit Print Preview right here and see the ugliness.]

A print stylesheet lets you control exactly what prints and exactly how it looks. Very cool.

How to do it? Here’s the best reference for WordPress users: Styling for Print from the WordPress codex.

Basically you take your current style.css stylesheet, and save a copy as print.css. Edit the print.css file and add a line at the beginning that says “@media print {” then put the closing brace “}” at the very end of the stylesheet, so the whole thing is contained within that declaration. Then add a line in your header to link the site to the new “print” stylesheet in addition to the original one. Just under the usual stylesheet declaration, you add something like:

<link rel=”stylesheet” type=”text/css” media=”print” href=”<?php bloginfo(’stylesheet_directory’); ?>/print.css” />

Note the media=”print” part! That’s what tells the browser this stylesheet is only for printer output!

Now edit away on the print.css stylesheet, “hiding” all the ids and classes you don’t want on the printout (e.g. some people don’t want the header or sidebars to print) by using the declaration {display: none;}. You can also doodle with the width of some elements (content, post or whatever) to get the most use out of your paper.

Then, what took the most time for me: change all your {font-size} declarations to pixels instead of em or percent. These relative font sizing designations are more desirable for the “screen” display, as they allow user-resizing of text and are more “accessibility” friendly. But printers like pixels, and you’ll find that stuff doesn’t look the same printed as it did on your monitor. Depending on the font, it may be unreadable. So for the “print.css” stylesheet, I changed all the font-size properties to pixels, then kept going back and doodling with them until I got a reasonably readable printed output.

Finally, you’ll find that there are many classes and ids you can just delete from the print.css stylesheet - for instance, all those which fall within another class which you’ve already blanked with {display: none;}. You’ll probably end up with a print.css stylesheet that’s very short and to the point, as compared to your “screen” stylesheet.

Important: We all know to measure twice and cut once, right? The web corollary is save a backup of your original and only work on copies! Once you start messing with print.css, you’re destined to leave an extra curly brace here or forget a semicolon there. Keep an untouched copy of the last clean, working version as a backup so you can revert to it when things mess up. And I do mean when, not if.

Anyone who’s an HTML, CSS or PHP guru (or any other kind of guru) can tell that I’m certainly NOT one. Everything I know is from “on the job training,” so there are bound to be better/ faster/ cheaper/ sexier ways to do everything than the way I do it. I’d certainly defer to the experts on any of this.

But maybe this’ll getcha started. ;-)

But I Don’t WANT To Be Like You

Some people just love to hear the sound of their own voice. If they receive reinforcement, especially compliments, they often become even more enamored with their own reflection and begin to confuse “I stated this because it’s true” with “This is true because I stated it.”

Some of those people have blogs.

I have a full-time job, three daughters and a life away from this computer. I get to daytrade one full day and usually one partial day each week and I constantly swing trade. The little bit of time I spend at the keyboard at night is split between research, reading and writing.

And I’m not really interested in wasting one minute of that time reading someone who’s using their blog as a form of masturbation.

So here’s what I do: When I read something interesting, entertaining, or that just looks like someone put a lot of work into it, I’ll send them a sort of a “ping” comment or email. Always complimentary and respectful. Usually make some kind of lame joke. But “Enjoy your work, thanks for going to the effort,” etc. As is customary with comment systems, my name will be linked back to this site.

Their response is how I know whether to add them to my Google Reader. It generally only comes in two forms- the first, which is similar to what I try to do when folks are kind enough to leave me a comment here, looks something like

“Hi Will, thank you for the compliment. I do work hard on (blah blah blah) and I think (yada yada yada). Also I find YOUR site (educational/ entertaining/ curious) and I see you’ve spent some DECADES (trading/ performing linear regression analysis/ getting spanked by Mr. Dow and Mr. Jones). Glad to hear from you.”

The Other kind of response is more like this:

“Yes, well you just keep trying and reading what I write. That big bad stock market is very complicated and it’s not everyone who can understand it like I do, but if you work really hard, one day when you grow up you too can start trading stocks and can be JUST LIKE ME.”

Really? Just like you? You mean, with my head up my own ass and all?

Sheesh.

 
Next entries »