<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The One-Minute Bar Experiment</title>
	<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/</link>
	<description>Stocks, Options, Currencies and One Big Dummy</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: estocastica</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-544</link>
		<author>estocastica</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-538</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>sami - thanks!  If I make a habit of this, I'll definitely be switching brokers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sami - thanks!  If I make a habit of this, I&#8217;ll definitely be switching brokers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sami</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-534</link>
		<author>sami</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>i think your experiment is called Scalping.
i've switched my Ameritrade IRA account to TradeStation recently, and i love it so far. i still have two individual accounts with Ameritrade and ScotTrade and i cannot stand trading via their websites any more. TradeStation is also a direct access broker with per share commission structure. I've heard others speak very highly of Interactive Brokers and CyberTrader. The Day Trader i respect the most (Brian from AlphaTrends) uses RealTick with TerraNova.  i think any and all of those brokers would be superior to AMTD for scalping purposes (and for charting, and for strategies, and for alerts, and the list goes on).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think your experiment is called Scalping.<br />
i&#8217;ve switched my Ameritrade IRA account to TradeStation recently, and i love it so far. i still have two individual accounts with Ameritrade and ScotTrade and i cannot stand trading via their websites any more. TradeStation is also a direct access broker with per share commission structure. I&#8217;ve heard others speak very highly of Interactive Brokers and CyberTrader. The Day Trader i respect the most (Brian from AlphaTrends) uses RealTick with TerraNova.  i think any and all of those brokers would be superior to AMTD for scalping purposes (and for charting, and for strategies, and for alerts, and the list goes on).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-533</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>esto- sorry for the delay in answering; had to work again today, and fight the crowds at Best Buy afterward!

As for the mental part- strangely enough, the visual scanning and evaluation was easier, if anything.  As you know, once we've daytraded for a while and the eyes and reflexes are conditioned to scanning multiple charts and spotting "moves of interest," watching 4 charts and a Last Sale stream on one stock (AAPL) is pretty straightforward (after having had 10-12 charts of DIFFERENT stocks running, and constantly scrolling symbols on at least 6 of those, working on narrowing down a starting list of 15-30 stocks, and trying not to miss a setup or a trade trigger on any of them).

Physically, though, it was exhausting!  It's mostly the stress of doing something new and unfamiliar (entering orders and switching sides over and over in a matter of seconds to minutes)... the feeling's not unlike the first few days any of us  daytraded with "real" money.  But there's also the underlying stress of  the unforseen... with a highly-leveraged position, something as simple as a computer hang could be devastating.  Even with lightning reflexes, dialing in on the phone and closing the position would take a minute or two, plenty long enough to lose a huge amount if the stock was running fast in the wrong direction.

If I were planning to do this kind of trading regularly, I'd probably need some kind of redundant setup.  Dual computers, cable modem AND DSL (or more likely, expensive separate dedicated lines), land line and cell phone.  I think it's just an entirely different playing field, and this one requires a different (and more expensive) set of equipment and tools.  Probably where a proprietary setup in an urban area would come in handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>esto- sorry for the delay in answering; had to work again today, and fight the crowds at Best Buy afterward!</p>
<p>As for the mental part- strangely enough, the visual scanning and evaluation was easier, if anything.  As you know, once we&#8217;ve daytraded for a while and the eyes and reflexes are conditioned to scanning multiple charts and spotting &#8220;moves of interest,&#8221; watching 4 charts and a Last Sale stream on one stock (AAPL) is pretty straightforward (after having had 10-12 charts of DIFFERENT stocks running, and constantly scrolling symbols on at least 6 of those, working on narrowing down a starting list of 15-30 stocks, and trying not to miss a setup or a trade trigger on any of them).</p>
<p>Physically, though, it was exhausting!  It&#8217;s mostly the stress of doing something new and unfamiliar (entering orders and switching sides over and over in a matter of seconds to minutes)&#8230; the feeling&#8217;s not unlike the first few days any of us  daytraded with &#8220;real&#8221; money.  But there&#8217;s also the underlying stress of  the unforseen&#8230; with a highly-leveraged position, something as simple as a computer hang could be devastating.  Even with lightning reflexes, dialing in on the phone and closing the position would take a minute or two, plenty long enough to lose a huge amount if the stock was running fast in the wrong direction.</p>
<p>If I were planning to do this kind of trading regularly, I&#8217;d probably need some kind of redundant setup.  Dual computers, cable modem AND DSL (or more likely, expensive separate dedicated lines), land line and cell phone.  I think it&#8217;s just an entirely different playing field, and this one requires a different (and more expensive) set of equipment and tools.  Probably where a proprietary setup in an urban area would come in handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estocastica</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-531</link>
		<author>estocastica</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/12/the-one-minute-bar-experiment/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  Did you find the experience to be more/less/equally mentally draining than trading longer timeframes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  Did you find the experience to be more/less/equally mentally draining than trading longer timeframes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
