Archive for July, 2006

Google
 

18 July 2006: Good News/Bad News on BRCM and GOOG

As I mentioned in previous posts here and here, I had swing positions in Broadcom and Google pointing in different directions.

My long on BRCM (position based on daily chart) got stopped out yesterday:

BRCM 5-day

My stop had moved up to 27.60 based on Friday’s low. Yesterday (Monday) morning, it spiked downward right off the bat, stopping me out. It proceeded to rally back above 28, and I was worried I was getting whipsawed and may need to re-enter. As you can see, it trailed back down by the end of the day. Best to move on. Will Continue To Follow, as they say.

The other swing trade I mentioned was a short on Google. This one is based on a weekly chart, which makes it lower-maintenance but also a great exercise in patience. You want to jump in there and move your stop or noodle with things every day, and you just can’t. Micromanaging longer-term positions is a no-no. It completely defeats the purpose.

After I heard about Yahoo’s bad news this evening, I hopped online and checked a quote:

0718 quotes

Sweet. Just plain sweet.

Quote of the Day

If you speak the truth, have a foot in the stirrup.
(Turkish proverb)

Money Heaven

At some point in every trader’s career, usually after he or she has witnessed their first major market decline, they arrive at the same question:

When the market drops, where does all that money go?

First of all, let me just say that it’s not the evil short sellers. If a company has 1 billion shares of stock outstanding, and there are 50 million shares sold short, when the stock declines the value lost on the other 950 million shares doesn’t go directly into anyone’s pocket. Please note that I said directly.(see below)

My first response to the Big Question is to answer it with another question - - the old Zen Koan from elementary school:

Where do the words go when you erase them from the chalkboard?

… “No, not the chalk, the words.”

If they press, I go into a long, boring dissertation about the liquidity drained from the equity market being the result of an inflationary oversupply of devalued dollars by a zealous Fed intent on fueling the acid train to hell that has become of our consumption-based immediate-gratification economy. That always clears things up.

Eventually I give them what many find a more satisfactory answer:

“It goes to Money Heaven.”

What’s the real answer? It’s that all that value doesn’t really vanish into thin air. It’s just transferred in a somewhat counterintuitive manner. Here’s a great article explaining the quite plausible alternative to Money Heaven.

CWPC diverges with oil market

Danger, Will Robinson!!

Pure play stocks usually trade in near-perfect unison with their related industry index. Oil stocks are one of the best examples. Except for rare occasions like market crashes, if oil is up, oil stocks are up. Bada bing, bada boom.

I often hear someone wonder how XOM (Exxon Mobil) rose $3 a share when “the market” was going down yesterday/last week/whatever.

I point out to them that oil gained, say, $6 a barrel over the same time period, and that’s why XOM rose as well. Oil up, Exxon up. Wax on, wax off. Don’t take a long-term short position in Exxon with oil in a sustained uptrend. To quote my 13 year-old.. DUH!

So what’s my point? It’s this: what if a pure-play stock and its related index suddenly start going in opposite directions? That’s a phenomenon known as divergence, and it always deserves your strict attention.

If the XOI (oil index) heads down and you’re long XOM, it’s time to pull your pants up (i.e. tighten your stops) and get ready to be escorted to the door. Don’t get focused on the stock and ignore the index and in this case, the underlying commodity. You do so at the peril of your trading account and your sanity.

Some of my friends have made a buttload of money over the last few months trading a little Bulletin Board Canadian stock called Canwest Petroleum, or CWPC. Or CWPC.OB. Or BB:CWPC. Depends on your quote system.

As oil rose from $50/bbl to $75/bbl, Canwest rose from under $1/share to over $8/share. Sweeet!! (vs. crude, I suppose)

However, over the last few days, CWPC has diverged greatly from its sector. And in the bad direction. I hope my friends have noticed this.

I’ve concocted a chart overlaying the prices of the XOI, XOM and CWPC. The charts are scaled to fit over each other so you can see the relative movement.

Here’s my little chart up to a few days ago:

oil

See any similarities?

Now look at the same chart extended thru last night:

oil

Notice how XOM has obediently tracked right on up with the price of oil and the XOI. And notice what’s happened with CWPC. Ladies and gentlemen, something smells funny!!

Now, we see a clear case of divergence here. What can we divine from it? Here are some possibilities:

  • Possibility One: The price of CWPC has been suppressed by insiders for accumulation reasons the last two weeks. That’s entirely possible with a little, foreign, BB stock. If this is what’s going on, CWPC is due for a huge move to the upside. If any of my friends neglected their stops and are still hung up in the stock, for them I hope this is the case.

    If this is the case, the chart will reveal when the operators are done, and it’ll be time to look to get long.

    I must say, if anyone asked me me to put my kids’ college money into Canwest right now, I’d be disinclined to acquiesce.

  • Possibility Two: Someone knows something, and the stock has decoupled from the oil market because it is sick. It takes a Ken Lay to build a facade as huge as Enron. A small, creative team working out of the CEO’s basement could pull it off with a Bulletin Board stock.

    If the rug has been pulled out from under this stock, we’ll start hearing the “news” after all the large shareholders are out, and after the price is long gone. Fortunately, anyone watching their charts and minding their stops will be out well before then. Are already out, actually.

Me? What am I gonna do? Well, I’ll keep an eye on it, and if The Chart shows me a break to the upside, I’ll be all over this puppy like stink on hot guts. Otherwise, I’ve got dishes to wash.

If you’re in this stock, write down on an index card where your stop is, and carry that card around with you. Refer to it often, trail it up if given the opportunity. If CWPC goes to $10 over the next month, you’ll be on board for the ride. If it heads downhill like a runaway train, you will have stepped off back up the mountain somewhere, and will be safely standing beside the track and watching it fade away.

Don’t Ask Me Why

I happen to be off from “workin’ for the man” this morning, and am doing a little day trading. The geopolitical turmoil has people confused, and has the “buy and hold hope” crowd very worried.

I just checked a quote on my two swing positions (see my last post about being pointed in different directions on these stocks):

quotes

With the overall market having an anxiety attack (Dow is down another 50 points as of this screenshot), I’m surprised that BRCM is holding up. People who insist on searching for reasons for everything would be trying to figure it out. The media is always happy to supply reasons, no matter how unfounded.

My response: Don’t ask me why. I’m at as big a loss as anyone to explain it. I’m just following my plan.

13 July 06: GOOG / BRCM Arbitrage? Or Am I Just Crazy?

Due to the market’s recent vascilliations, I’m left in the somewhat unusual position of being long BRCM and short GOOG at the same time. Now that may sound like some oddball way to arbitrage the volatility difference between these two, but that’s not at all what it is. And it’s certainly not an attempt at a straddle. I’d need a really long inseam to avoid those barbs!

My positions are in complete compliance with Da Rules. Rule #1 (or 3, I forget) is to always be aware of your time frame. I’m a firm believer that changing time frames after a trade is entered is one of the biggest pitfalls in trading, usually because it’s done out of the subconscious need to find a way to avoid being proven wrong.

I’ve used the example before that it’s perfectly alright to do a daytrade short sale on a stock that’s in a strong long-term uptrend; the two timeframes have nothing to do with each other. Trade within the appropriate time frame. Move with the groove. Work your mojo, grasshoppa.

The short on Google is based on a weekly chart, with position sizing and stop to match. The long on Broadcom is based on a daily chart, ditto ditto ditto.

Will these positions make me rich? Hell if I know! All I know for sure is exactly how much I stand to lose if/when I’m wrong, and that it’s an amount I’m comfortable with. Mandatory before entering any trade, you see. I’ll flip either of ‘em in a heartbeat if the chart tells me to.

Cheers. If gas goes up much more, it may be cheaper to pour Jack Daniels in my tank!!

The Importance of Stops (13 July 2006)

Over the years, I’ve come to think of successfully managing stops as the most crucial part of trading- and the most elusive.

There are virtually an unlimited number of ways to make entry decisions. What’s most important about selection methodology is that you choose one which you completely understand and which matches your temperament.

There are the various technical indicators (“buy when the 50 crosses the 200″, “short when the stochastics indicator crosses 80 from above”, “buy when the ADX is above 20 and the price retraces to the 20EMA”, etc). There are fundamental indicators (”their gross margins and revenue have been accelerating for 3 quarters now”). And of course, there’s the most popular indicator of all, “they say.”


MIA:   Is that a fact?

VINCENT:   No it’s not, it’s just what I heard.

MIA:   Who told you this?

VINCENT:   They.

MIA:   They talk a lot, don’t they?

Our success doesn’t depend so much on which method we use to enter positions (except for “they say”). It depends on what we do with those positions once entered.

Few positions are losers from the instant we enter until we exit– most are in the money at some point. The gains or losses we eventually take on them are due to our exit strategy.

To make matters worse, we usually don’t modify our exit techniques at all after a loss due to bad stop management (or none). We play the game of “woulda, coulda, shoulda,” bemoaning how this one “got away,” and set about looking for the next entry “opportunity.”

Let me take a moment here to mention various, often outrageously expensive software packages and “advisory newsletters.” These all exist in response to our collective addiction to ignoring the lessons our own trading teaches us, and instead searching more obsessively for the next great entry opportunity. Those entries are not what will make you money; they only create the potential. Where you exit determines your profit. I know that seems overly obvious, but it is a crucial lesson we often ignore.

How many times have you bragged about how much you could have made if you’d sold at such-and-such a price? Why didn’t you sell? Why did you hold hoping for more (and feeling smug)… then hold hoping to get back near the top (and feeling panicky)… then find yourself just hoping to break even (and feeling like someone just took a quart of your blood)?

That’s Trading 101. No, I take that back. It’s remedial trading.

Until we accept our fundamental nature as animals at the mercy of operant conditioning (and particularly variable reinforcement), we can never expect to succeed at anything that can fool us with occasional rewards. That’s why casinos thrive. We think we see patterns or can figure out strategies on something as mathematically rigid as a Roulette wheel, when all that’s happening is a reward here and there, no matter what our “strategy” is. How much more do these tendencies sabotage us in something as vast and opaque as the stock market!

When you’ve bought (or sold short) based on whatever method you choose, you must know your exit strategy in advance. You cannot expect to magically find the ability to override your natural propensities just at the right moment. That does not make you weak, or a failure. It makes you human. Welcome to the race.

Your long-term success in trading depends largely on your stop methods. If you spend your trading career ignoring the necessity of clear exit rules (whether due to pride, greed, emotion or ignorance), you will remain in a churning, chaotic world of lost opportunities, and will eventually bankrupt both your trading account and your self-esteem.

How do I set my stops?

This is truly a subject for an entirely separate article, because it’s just about as nebulous a question as “where should I buy.” I will try to summarize here by saying the stop should be geared to the particular trade: always consider your time frame (rule #1… or 3, I forget) and always consider the volatility of the particular stock (more volatile requires a wider stop).

I use various stop strategies, and they’re always evolving, because as I said at the beginning of this article, I think it’s the most crucial and elusive part of trading.

Right now, my favorite technique is a variation on the PSAR, where I trail my stop based on the difference between the previous stop level and the hi or lo of the most recent bar (that can be 5min bars for daytrading, or weekly bars for position trading). It ain’t the Holy Grail, but it does pretty well at keeping me in for a move, but taking me out before I bleed too much. Other times I’ll use a method as simple as setting the low of the prior bar (or prior 2 or 3 or 4 bars) as a stop. All depends on the “sitchiation”.

Cheers, and best of luck with your trading!


11 July 06: Dummy Looks at IFO

IFO is Infosonics Corp. Trades on the AMEX.

I’m likin’ the way this chart looks. If stock charts were Playboy, the ones like this would be Centerfolds. A break to the upside on huge volume, then a textbook pullback on fading volume. Have a look while I go take a cold shower:

IFO

What I’ll be looking for:

  • Entry tomorrow: Long above today’s high of 7.60 with a stop at today’s low of 6.81.

  • Position size? Purely based on risk, not price. One of the great quantum-leap realizations in my trading life.

    I’d be comfortable losing $150 on this trade, so with a risk (or “R” if you like) of 0.79 (entry price - inital stop), I’d need to buy 150/0.79, or about 200 shares. Sometimes I have to buy $40,000 worth of stock to put $150 at risk. Here I’ll be buying about $1500 worth in order to achieve the same goal.

    Oh, and if you’re wondering why I wouldn’t buy 10 times that much stock, after all, look at how much I’d make if it goes to 12… well then, you ain’t got yer mind right. Stay away from the boats and Vegas.

  • If tomorrow prints another lower bar on low volume, I’ll reset my entry rules for the next day based on that bar.

  • If tomorrow prints a long black candle on increasing volume, I’ll forget the name of this company by bedtime and never look back.

12 July 06

Ok. Day 1, trade taken. The market was ugly with a capital “ugh” today. Dow -122, Nasdaq -39. Not the best day to go long. However, although tomorrow could be either a beautiful rebound OR a serious breakdown for the market, today was neither. IFO hit 7.60, I took the trade. Rules is rules.

Here’s the chart:

IFO

Inverted hammer. Bullish “if there is follow-through.” Duh! And futher withering volume. The low volume is encouraging, given the candle. A long white (blue) candle on above-average volume would have been pristine. Pristine doesn’t happen much. Welcome to trading.

The next 1-3 trading days are like the takeoff of an airplane: the most hazardous time. Let’s watch.

13 July 06

Got stopped out quickly this morning. My stop had trailed up to 7.20, just below yesterday’s low of 7.26.

The open today was something of a mess. I ended up getting out at 7.04.

IFO

C’est la vie. I could poormouth about the entire market breaking down, yada, yada, yada. But I’m not. I set my rules, I followed my rules. I got stopped well within the range of what I considered an acceptable loss. On with the show.

« Previous entries