<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Volume - Accumulation or Breakdown?</title>
	<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/01/intel-volume-accumulation-or-breakdown/</link>
	<description>Stocks, Options, Currencies and One Big Dummy</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dummyspots.com &#187; 28 Apr 06: A Spark in the INTC chart?</title>
		<link>http://dummyspots.com/2006/01/intel-volume-accumulation-or-breakdown/#comment-14</link>
		<author>dummyspots.com &#187; 28 Apr 06: A Spark in the INTC chart?</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dummyspots.com/2006/01/intel-volume-accumulation-or-breakdown/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in January, in addition to noting the historic options expiration day, I also mused a little on the massive volume in Intel, and, due to the fact that the price was not holding even after the big drop, I said the following: Because of that action, I’m inclined to think INTC is being abandoned. If so, that would probably mean months of sideways movement, at the least. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Back in January, in addition to noting the historic options expiration day, I also mused a little on the massive volume in Intel, and, due to the fact that the price was not holding even after the big drop, I said the following: Because of that action, I’m inclined to think INTC is being abandoned. If so, that would probably mean months of sideways movement, at the least. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
